DAOplomats Delegate Platform

Delegate Name: DAOplomats
Delegate Address: 0x5762F3074605df17AebE3f5BC8FC7f8702aca752
Forum Handle(s): @jengajojo @0xbaer
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DAOplomats

Our Values:

Objective decision making: We design and implement decision making frameworks which enable us to perform qualitative and quantitate analysis in order to arrive at conclusions

Decentralisation: We believe in a highly distributed power structures and strive to push decision making power to the edges

Positive sum: We strive to make our interactions positive sum whenever possible to allow maximum number of stakeholders to benefit via collaboration

Areas of expertise:
Grant programs, operational frameworks, risk analysis, decentralised governance
Past experience in DAO governance . Our members are active governors in BanklessDAO, 1inchDAO & EulerDAO. We were spun out from BanklessDAO and have the ability to tap into that talent.

Conflicts of Interest:

We are active in governance at several DAOs in the ecosystem

4 Likes

Please indicate your monthly activity on your delegate post here.

Here are the requirements for compensation.

Compensation Eligibility:

  • Communicate on the IP forum how and why a delegate voted the way they did within seven days of the close of a vote (minimum 90% of the time) in their dedicated delegate thread.
  • Command voting weight greater than or equal to 1 basis point of the total IPT supply
  • Participate in at least 90% of all on-chain IP votes within the previous 90 days
  • The Recognized Delegate (or one authorized representative if a team or institution) must attend at least one public protocol development call each month
2 Likes

Hello,
We have booked the date for the first monthly call for delegates on Feb 10; please check discord for the event post - which will indicate the meeting in your local time.

1 Like

Have ‘0’ Voting power, so Cant vote on proposals!
Attending the call on Feb 10 as Baer.eth

1 Like

Failed to self delegate the votes in time

1 Like

1 Like

@jengajojo attended Meeting on Friday 29th April 2023

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x8d4bb10382c01f0c2a55a57fefe6fa09aef38ea71acc8d91029a1d239be8f3dd.

Our votes aren’t recognised by the UI

voted to abstain from the proposal due to our inability to verify the data provided on the proposal

From 29/11/2023 16:08

Please use the same wallet address as the delegate address. Also please indicate in the forum on each vote made. That will be what will be referenced for it along with onchain validation. If you have vooted on the october expenses let me know (however the wallet address must match the delegate address indicated above)

Also please remember this is a requirement "Communicate on the IP forum how and why a delegate voted the way they did within seven days of the close of a vote " - this is a req along with actually voting

can you elaborate on what exactly you meant by

and.

we have voted with the same wallet account


from 12/12/23

For future reference
Compensation Eligibility:

  • Communicate on the IP forum how and why a delegate voted the way they did within seven days of the close of a vote (minimum 90% of the time) in their dedicated delegate thread.
  • Command voting weight greater than or equal to 1 basis point of the total IPT supply;
  • Participate in at least 90% of all on-chain IP votes within the previous 90 days
  • The Recognized Delegate (or one authorized representative if a team or institution) must attend at least one public protocol development call each month.
1 Like

and what about the wallet? @feems

wallet should be fine i just dont know why its not appearing on UI, inquire with Getty or Paperimperium for the solve

1 Like

Vote
Proposal ID: 43
Voted No: The Proposal has a Typo and should be proposed again.

Proof of vote:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x735c1bdb05513dbaaa505d86b6aab90bc8ce39fc4a2ab6103292c8f6b1c6797e#eventlog

2 Likes

Proposal ID 44
Voted yes
n :
DAOplomats agree with the author in adding UniV3 LP NFTs as collateral and support the protocol upgrade.

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x611608777c68a8d4408e234c350a6fd6d555cad14e71930c0b326dcc36fe13e3

1 Like

08/01/2024 18:24

Proposal 47: to update oracle for CappedB_stETH_STABLE.

Voted yes: as the reason to update the oracle is reasonable considering the liquidity.

PoV: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xb4d53a814be669ffdfd99f4eb09965a707cfb012a6c7494108d94aaa2cdb52d8

1 Like